Long after his heyday in the 1910s and 1920s, Jules Brulatour was the victim of a violent and mysterious episode in 1939: he was wounded in a shooting by an assailant whom he publicly refused to identify. Press accounts at the time described it as a would‑be assassination; Brulatour’s insistence on silence meant the case produced no courtroom revelations and remained unsolved. Given Brulatour’s prior entanglements—industrial adversaries at Kodak, bruising divorce battles, and a high‑profile presence in both entertainment and Washington—the refusal to finger the shooter invited speculation. But the concrete facts remain stark and simple: a prominent early-film executive shot and injured, never disclosing his attacker, leaving a real-world, open-ended crime in the shadows of Hollywood’s golden‑age mythology.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1930s
The Unsolved 1939 Shooting: A Hollywood Executive Wounded but Silent
Jules Brulatour / 1930s
Long after his heyday in the 1910s and 1920s, Jules Brulatour was the victim of a violent and mysterious episode in 1939: he was wounded in a shooting by an assailant whom he publicly refused to identify. Press accounts at the time described it as a would‑be assassination; Brulatour’s insistence on silence meant the case produced no courtroom revelations and remained unsolved. Given Brulatour’s prior entanglements—industrial adversaries at Kodak, bruising divorce battles, and a high‑profile presence in both entertainment and Washington—the refusal to finger the shooter invited speculation. But the concrete facts remain stark and simple: a prominent early-film executive shot and injured, never disclosing his attacker, leaving a real-world, open-ended crime in the shadows of Hollywood’s golden‑age mythology.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
