On August 20, 2020, Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny fell violently ill aboard a Tomsk-to-Moscow flight and was rushed off the plane in an emergency landing to a hospital in Omsk, Siberia, where he slipped into a coma. Two days later he was evacuated to Berlin’s Charité hospital; five laboratories certified by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons later confirmed exposure to a Novichok nerve agent. Navalny publicly blamed President Vladimir Putin for the attack while the Kremlin repeatedly denied involvement. The attempted assassination became an international incident and the through-line of Daniel Roher’s 2022 documentary Navalny, which follows the poisoning aftermath and the painstaking investigation that followed.
Roher’s film chronicles how investigative operatives — notably Bellingcat journalist Christo Grozev and Maria Pevchikh, head investigator for Navalny’s Anti‑Corruption Foundation — pieced together elements of a plot that the filmmakers present as pointing toward Kremlin involvement. Production on the documentary began shortly after Navalny recovered from his coma and continued up through his arrest in January 2021; according to the film’s account, the crew shadowed him closely, even at airport border control. The finished film, produced by HBO Max and CNN Films alongside Fishbowl Films, RaeFilm Studios and Cottage M, premiered at Sundance on January 25, 2022 (winning the U.S. Documentary Audience Award and Festival Favorite) and later won Best Documentary Feature at the 95th Academy Awards and other major prizes, turning a raw act of political violence into a globally seen dossier. The film’s continued circulation — including broadcasts on CNN, BBC2, and notably on February 16, 2024, the day reported as Navalny’s death — cemented it as a public record of the poisoning, the international forensic confirmations, and the bitter contest between an opposition figure and an authoritarian state.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.