Contemporaneous accounts and later anecdotes assert that Best Defense's poor hold‑through caused significant losses for some exhibitors — it opened strongly at No. 2 with $7.8 million behind Ghostbusters but rapidly collapsed — and that those losses helped trigger legal and contractual backlash against the practice of blind bidding (where exhibitors commit to booking a film sight unseen). Some sources claim Pennsylvania moved to outlaw blind bids and that the controversy accelerated a wider industry decline of the practice. However, the specific connection between Best Defense's financial underperformance and state anti‑blind‑bidding legislation is cited unevenly in retrospective writeups and is flagged in some primary summaries as lacking direct documentation. The story has circulated in trade lore as an example of how a single studio misstep could allegedly reshape exhibitor protections, but the precise causal chain and legal record tying Best Defense to the outlawing of blind bidding in Pennsylvania remain unproven in mainstream archival sources.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.