Brulatour’s rise made him a central figure in the raw-film business: he represented Lumiere, supplied independents through the Sales Company, and later became closely associated with Eastman Kodak. That concentration of influence attracted antitrust scrutiny. After a three-year investigation, the Federal Trade Commission in 1926 imposed severe fines on Brulatour and Kodak founder George Eastman for what it described as a conspiracy to hinder and restrain commercial competition. The case reflected a broader struggle over whether the young motion-picture industry would be controlled by a small group of patent holders, manufacturers, distributors, and studio executives. Brulatour’s career had begun by helping independents evade Edison’s monopoly, yet his later position within Kodak placed him on the other side of the same competitive battle. The proceedings did not erase Kodak’s dominance, but they became a significant legal mark against the industry’s attempts to control access to film stock and shape which producers could operate profitably.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.