Simon Nuchtern’s Vietnam–era drama Cowards premiered in 1970 and even played at the Cannes Film Festival, yet it was a commercial nonstarter. Critics were mixed to hostile — Roger Greenspun of The New York Times called it “one of the squarest, most unashamedly flat‑footed films of the year” even as he praised some performances, while the New York Daily News and TV Guide dismissed it as talky and inept. Rather than mount a second attempt at re‑marketing the director’s original vision, the film’s backers took a cruder route: after the box office failure the movie was physically re‑edited and padded with newly shot erotic sequences featuring actors unrelated to the original production. The repackaged film was retitled Love‑In '72 and repositioned squarely as sexploitation fare to chase a very different audience and dollar.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1970s
How Cowards (1970) Was Stripped, Spliced and Resold as the Sexploitation Shocker Love-In '72 — and Its Director Erased
Cowards (1970) / Love-In '72 (reissue) / 1970s
Simon Nuchtern’s Vietnam–era drama Cowards premiered in 1970 and even played at the Cannes Film Festival, yet it was a commercial nonstarter. Critics were mixed to hostile — Roger Greenspun of The New York Times called it “one of the squarest, most unashamedly flat‑footed films of the year” even as he praised some performances, while the New York Daily News and TV Guide dismissed it as talky and inept. Rather than mount a second attempt at re‑marketing the director’s original vision, the film’s backers took a cruder route: after the box office failure the movie was physically re‑edited and padded with newly shot erotic sequences featuring actors unrelated to the original production. The repackaged film was retitled Love‑In '72 and repositioned squarely as sexploitation fare to chase a very different audience and dollar.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
