After publishing Legion in 1983, the sequel-novel to The Exorcist, William Peter Blatty took the rare step of suing The New York Times Book Review for not listing Legion on its best‑seller list. The move exposed how fiercely authors of Blatty’s stature guarded the commercial and symbolic capital of a Times listing; bestseller status could mean the difference between a high‑profile adaptation and a book that slipped from public notice. The lawsuit sits amid a chain of production disputes: Blatty fought to maintain creative control—insisting on directing his own adaptation—and later worked with agent Steve Jaffe and producer Carter DeHaven at Morgan Creek to get the film made. Producers, however, overrode his preferred title Legion and pushed the more marketable The Exorcist III, forcing Blatty into compromises that the lawsuit underscored. The episode is a revealing example of an established writer battling powerful cultural gatekeepers and the film industry’s branding impulses in the 1980s.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.