In the run-up to Austin Powers in Goldmember's 2002 release, a very unglamorous studio spat erupted between New Line Cinema and MGM — the latter the distributor of the James Bond franchise. MGM objected to the film's title, arguing that the obvious echo of Bond titles (and the use of a Bondish villain name, Goldmember/Gol(d)finger) was too close for comfort. The dispute was serious enough that promotional materials and trailers for Goldmember were briefly pulled while lawyers negotiated, and New Line even prepared several substitute titles — License to Shag, Live and Let Shag, You Only Shag Thrice and Never Say Member Again — ready to deploy if necessary. The impasse was resolved quickly, but not quietly: the settlement kept Goldmember on the marquee only after New Line agreed to include cinema trailers for two high-profile MGM-distributed projects, Die Another Day and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, in Goldmember's theatrical print runs. The episode stands as a reminder that even broad comedies can stumble into high-stakes studio politics, and that title disputes sometimes end in pragmatic trade-offs rather than public precedent-setting court battles.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.