In August 1978, while The Brink's Job was nearing release, armed robbers hijacked fifteen unedited reels of the film. The thieves demanded $1 million for their return, apparently assuming they possessed the finished motion picture or some other uniquely valuable Hollywood asset. Their scheme collapsed because they had stolen outtakes and dailies rather than the completed release prints. Positive prints made from the negatives were being held by Technicolor in New York City, so the production could replace the missing material without a significant delay. The attempted ransom nevertheless triggered an FBI investigation, turning a film about one of America’s most notorious robberies into the target of a remarkably inept robbery of its own. During the ransom call, director Friedkin reportedly told the thieves to get a projector and enjoy the film because the stolen material was all theirs—a characteristically sardonic response to a crime rendered pointless by the robbers’ lack of filmmaking knowledge.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1970s
Armed Thieves Stole Fifteen Reels of The Brink's Job—Then Demanded a Million-Dollar Ransom
The Brink's Job / 1970s
In August 1978, while The Brink's Job was nearing release, armed robbers hijacked fifteen unedited reels of the film. The thieves demanded $1 million for their return, apparently assuming they possessed the finished motion picture or some other uniquely valuable Hollywood asset. Their scheme collapsed because they had stolen outtakes and dailies rather than the completed release prints. Positive prints made from the negatives were being held by Technicolor in New York City, so the production could replace the missing material without a significant delay. The attempted ransom nevertheless triggered an FBI investigation, turning a film about one of America’s most notorious robberies into the target of a remarkably inept robbery of its own. During the ransom call, director Friedkin reportedly told the thieves to get a projector and enjoy the film because the stolen material was all theirs—a characteristically sardonic response to a crime rendered pointless by the robbers’ lack of filmmaking knowledge.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
