Frederic Raphael’s long, behind-the-scenes chronicle of his collaboration with Stanley Kubrick on the director’s final film exploded into a public controversy the year the movie was released. Raphael — an established Oscar-winning screenwriter who had been brought in to help adapt Arthur Schnitzler’s Dream Story into what became Eyes Wide Shut — kept detailed journals during the collaboration and in 1999 distilled them into a memoir titled Eyes Wide Open. The book, and an accompanying New Yorker article in which Raphael excerpted controversial material, made candid claims about Kubrick’s working methods, temperament and the dynamics on set during the months of scripting and pre-production. Because Kubrick died in March 1999, just months before the film’s July release, Raphael’s recollections landed in a fraught public arena: supporters and family members of the late director regarded the book as an unforgiving, sometimes indiscreet portrait.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1990s
The 1999 Eyes Wide Open Memoir That Set Frederic Raphael Against Kubrick’s Inner Circle
Eyes Wide Shut / Frederic Raphael / 1990s
Frederic Raphael’s long, behind-the-scenes chronicle of his collaboration with Stanley Kubrick on the director’s final film exploded into a public controversy the year the movie was released. Raphael — an established Oscar-winning screenwriter who had been brought in to help adapt Arthur Schnitzler’s Dream Story into what became Eyes Wide Shut — kept detailed journals during the collaboration and in 1999 distilled them into a memoir titled Eyes Wide Open. The book, and an accompanying New Yorker article in which Raphael excerpted controversial material, made candid claims about Kubrick’s working methods, temperament and the dynamics on set during the months of scripting and pre-production. Because Kubrick died in March 1999, just months before the film’s July release, Raphael’s recollections landed in a fraught public arena: supporters and family members of the late director regarded the book as an unforgiving, sometimes indiscreet portrait.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
