In a dramatic legal counterpunch in October 2017, Ferrer sued the very charity he had helped create, claiming trademark infringement and asserting that the fund no longer had the right to use Audrey Hepburn's name or likeness without his permission. The procedural posture of that suit produced its own twists: a judge dismissed Ferrer's 2017 complaint in March 2018 on the technical ground that he had failed to name Luca Dotti — Audrey's other heir and co-controller of her estate — as a defendant. The dispute did not end there. In 2019 a court ultimately sided with Ferrer, ruling that the charity could not exploit Hepburn's image without the consent of both heirs, a decision that effectively reasserted family control over a star's charitable brand. The litigation left a twofold legacy: a public rift over stewardship of an iconic Hollywood image, and a cautionary tale about how celebrity foundations can implode into bitter inheritance fights when governance and intellectual-property rights are not firmly codified.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.