A Chorus Line reached the screen after years of failed attempts to solve what many filmmakers considered an impossible adaptation problem: how to turn a musical set largely in one audition room into cinematic drama. Arnold Schulman said that he finally devised a more surrealistic approach that persuaded Norman Lear and Jerry Perenchio to commit $24 million of their own money. Richard Attenborough apparently approved enough of the concept to agree to direct, but Schulman later claimed that Attenborough discarded the script and attempted to photograph the stage play in a much more literal fashion.
The disagreement became part of the film's troubled legacy. Schulman said that once Lear and Perenchio sold their company to Columbia, the studio wanted nothing to do with the project, while Columbia, Embassy, the producers, and Attenborough were all fighting over casting and other decisions. He praised Attenborough personally as a decent and intelligent man, but portrayed him as the individual forced to absorb the pressure created by the fractured production. The resulting film was attacked by some critics and by members of the original Broadway company for retaining the stage show's confined structure while losing much of its grit, urgency, and specificity. Original Sheila Kelly Bishop was especially furious when Attenborough described the story on television as being about young people trying to break into show business; she argued that it was really about veteran dancers facing the end of their careers.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.