Bagans’ status as a commercial paranormal figure did not insulate him from literary controversy. After co-writing Dark World (2011) and later publishing Ghost‑Hunting For Dummies in December 2019, Bagans was accused by researcher Troy Taylor of using original material without permission. Taylor publicly stated that Bagans had not secured permission to use Taylor’s research and that the matter was resolved with 'a substantial payment' to Taylor. The episode drew sharper critical fire from the Skeptical Inquirer and investigator Kenny Biddle, who noted a pronounced bias against skeptics in Bagans' book and pointed out passages similar to work by established investigators like Joe Nickell and the Society for Psychical Research. The combination of a private settlement and public critique from skeptical watchdogs complicated Bagans’ credibility among researchers and reinforced contention over the boundaries between popular entertainment, intellectual property, and ethical research standards in paranormal journalism.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
Authorship Dispute and Settlement over Ghost‑Hunting For Dummies
Zak Bagans (Ghost‑Hunting For Dummies; Troy Taylor) / 2010s
Bagans’ status as a commercial paranormal figure did not insulate him from literary controversy. After co-writing Dark World (2011) and later publishing Ghost‑Hunting For Dummies in December 2019, Bagans was accused by researcher Troy Taylor of using original material without permission. Taylor publicly stated that Bagans had not secured permission to use Taylor’s research and that the matter was resolved with 'a substantial payment' to Taylor. The episode drew sharper critical fire from the Skeptical Inquirer and investigator Kenny Biddle, who noted a pronounced bias against skeptics in Bagans' book and pointed out passages similar to work by established investigators like Joe Nickell and the Society for Psychical Research. The combination of a private settlement and public critique from skeptical watchdogs complicated Bagans’ credibility among researchers and reinforced contention over the boundaries between popular entertainment, intellectual property, and ethical research standards in paranormal journalism.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
