Ulli Lommel’s 1983 sequel, Boogeyman II, became entangled in Britain’s notorious “video nasty” panic, a period when horror films were accused of corrupting viewers and faced intense censorship scrutiny. The film—starring Suzanna Love, Lommel, and Shannah Hall—was banned in the United Kingdom and circulated under the alternate title Revenge of the Boogeyman. Its controversial reputation was amplified by the plot’s deliberately lurid premise: Lacey travels to Los Angeles to present filmmakers with her account of supernatural events involving a malevolent spirit trapped inside a mirror, only for a fragment of that mirror to unleash a new series of killings. The sequel’s framing device—filmmakers attempting to recreate supposedly true events—blurred the line between horror fiction and alleged real-life testimony, a quality that fit the era’s fears about dangerous or psychologically harmful videotapes. The British ban became the film’s most enduring piece of notoriety, ensuring that its censorship history overshadowed its limited production legacy and preserving it as part of the cult record of banned 1980s horror cinema.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1980s
The 1983 Horror Sequel Branded a British “Video Nasty”
Boogeyman II (Revenge of the Boogeyman) / 1980s
Ulli Lommel’s 1983 sequel, Boogeyman II, became entangled in Britain’s notorious “video nasty” panic, a period when horror films were accused of corrupting viewers and faced intense censorship scrutiny. The film—starring Suzanna Love, Lommel, and Shannah Hall—was banned in the United Kingdom and circulated under the alternate title Revenge of the Boogeyman. Its controversial reputation was amplified by the plot’s deliberately lurid premise: Lacey travels to Los Angeles to present filmmakers with her account of supernatural events involving a malevolent spirit trapped inside a mirror, only for a fragment of that mirror to unleash a new series of killings. The sequel’s framing device—filmmakers attempting to recreate supposedly true events—blurred the line between horror fiction and alleged real-life testimony, a quality that fit the era’s fears about dangerous or psychologically harmful videotapes. The British ban became the film’s most enduring piece of notoriety, ensuring that its censorship history overshadowed its limited production legacy and preserving it as part of the cult record of banned 1980s horror cinema.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.