The road to Blade Runner was nearly derailed by an acrimonious screenplay dispute involving the film's source novelist, Philip K. Dick. Hampton Fancher's early adaptation, optioned in 1977, simplified the philosophical machinery of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? into a more conventional detective story centered on a supposedly binary conflict between a human and an android. Dick did not merely express private reservations: he criticized the screenplay publicly in the Los Angeles press, calling it a "terrible script" and describing it as "corny" and "extremely maladroit throughout." He objected that Fancher had leaned too heavily on a cliché-ridden, Raymond Chandler-style hero and had reduced the novel's meditation on humanity, religion, and empathy to a lurid survival contest.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1980s
Philip K. Dick Publicly Condemns the First Blade Runner Script
Blade Runner / Philip K. Dick / Hampton Fancher / 1980s
The road to Blade Runner was nearly derailed by an acrimonious screenplay dispute involving the film's source novelist, Philip K. Dick. Hampton Fancher's early adaptation, optioned in 1977, simplified the philosophical machinery of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? into a more conventional detective story centered on a supposedly binary conflict between a human and an android. Dick did not merely express private reservations: he criticized the screenplay publicly in the Los Angeles press, calling it a "terrible script" and describing it as "corny" and "extremely maladroit throughout." He objected that Fancher had leaned too heavily on a cliché-ridden, Raymond Chandler-style hero and had reduced the novel's meditation on humanity, religion, and empathy to a lurid survival contest.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
