Bette Davis, Stanley Z. Cherry, and American International Pictures / 1970s
Davis responded to the changes by suing American International Pictures for approximately $3.3 million, claiming that the studio’s alteration of Bunny O’Hare damaged her professional reputation and cost her income. Her complaint went beyond ordinary dissatisfaction with a poor review: she argued that AIP had transformed a socially pointed film into a crude slapstick production, effectively delivering a different movie from the one she had agreed to make. The suit was eventually dropped, leaving no major courtroom ruling establishing whether AIP had violated her approval rights. The production also generated a separate contractual dispute when writer Stanley Z. Cherry sued for $13,400 he said remained unpaid and sought an additional five percent of the film’s net profits. The reported outcome of Cherry’s action is unknown, making Bunny O’Hare an unusually contentious little comedy despite its modest profile and generally negative reception.
Follow the sources
Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.