For more than a year, filmmakers Keith Parkes and Walter E. Crichlow embedded themselves with members of the National Socialist White People's Party in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Tracy, California, waiting for the extremists to permit cameras into their homes, family life, and political rituals. Their strategy was deliberately restrained: instead of using narration to denounce the movement, they adopted a cinéma vérité approach and allowed the subjects to speak in their own words. The result included an outgoing telephone message recorded by party member Arnie Anderson, a gathering in which American neo-Nazis pledged allegiance to Adolf Hitler, and confrontations involving Jewish Defense League leader Irv Rubin. The film’s calculated neutrality became its central controversy. Some critics argued that it treated the Nazis too mildly or displayed a troubling ambivalence toward them, while others believed the absence of editorial commentary made the participants’ banality and extremism even more horrifying. The New York Times noted that the filmmakers wanted to show the Nazis not as inhuman monsters but as people living within ordinary American society; critic Judith Crist argued that this very ordinariness made the film terrifying. Its most disturbing episode involved a ten-year-old boy who admitted that he did not share his father’s ideology but attended youth meetings to please him. The California Reich screened at Cannes in 1976, earned an Academy Award nomination for Best Documentary Feature, and later supplied footage for the 1980 comedy The Blues Brothers, where a neo-Nazi rally speech was repurposed for comic effect.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1970s
The Documentary That Let California Neo-Nazis Condemn Themselves on Camera
The California Reich / 1970s
For more than a year, filmmakers Keith Parkes and Walter E. Crichlow embedded themselves with members of the National Socialist White People's Party in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Tracy, California, waiting for the extremists to permit cameras into their homes, family life, and political rituals. Their strategy was deliberately restrained: instead of using narration to denounce the movement, they adopted a cinéma vérité approach and allowed the subjects to speak in their own words. The result included an outgoing telephone message recorded by party member Arnie Anderson, a gathering in which American neo-Nazis pledged allegiance to Adolf Hitler, and confrontations involving Jewish Defense League leader Irv Rubin. The film’s calculated neutrality became its central controversy. Some critics argued that it treated the Nazis too mildly or displayed a troubling ambivalence toward them, while others believed the absence of editorial commentary made the participants’ banality and extremism even more horrifying. The New York Times noted that the filmmakers wanted to show the Nazis not as inhuman monsters but as people living within ordinary American society; critic Judith Crist argued that this very ordinariness made the film terrifying. Its most disturbing episode involved a ten-year-old boy who admitted that he did not share his father’s ideology but attended youth meetings to please him. The California Reich screened at Cannes in 1976, earned an Academy Award nomination for Best Documentary Feature, and later supplied footage for the 1980 comedy The Blues Brothers, where a neo-Nazi rally speech was repurposed for comic effect.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.